Although France's diplomatic rhetoric often supports a two-state solution and Palestinian self-determination, but its actions, such as arms sales to ‘Israel’, contradict this stance.
You have repeatedly denounced the imperialist dynamic in global conflicts. In relation to the Ukraine-Russia war, how do you analyze Ukraine’s dependence on the US, which, unlike Palestine, which was able to defeat Israel through its resistance, seems to have ceded its lands to Russia and its resources to the Americans?
As I see it, there are three major multi-faceted issues that needs to be highlighted here; which ultimately led to the Ukraine-Russia war: Firstly, the Corruption factor as Ukraine has faced significant challenges with corruption since gaining independence in 1991; a corruption that has been pervasive in almost every sector of the country’s political and economic fabric, including government, military, law enforcement and business. The second factor is with geo-political importance and it has been growing during the last three decades as the U.S. and the Wesam powers mainly EU, Britain and NATO, have worked relentlessly, both publicly and behind the scenes through intelligence and special undercover operations, to expand eastwards. These geo-political expansionist interests and practices took the post-cold war conflict with Russia to a new level following the U.S./Western-backed coup in Ukraine in 2014 and the subsequent ousting of President Victor Yanukovych and the Euromaidan protests. To Moscow, these events led to ousting a legitimate government and the rise of a hostile regime in Kyiv. From a broader group-political perspective, this threat, which continued to take many serious forms and shapes, was intolerable by Russia which sees Ukraine as a critical buffer Zone against the American and Western influence. Also, Ukraine’s economic ties with Russia, particularly in terms of energy transit and trade, are extremely vital, and disruptions in these relationships, especially after Ukraine sought closer relationships with the West including seeking a NATO membership, have been a point of contention and considered as a Red Line by Moscow. Not only the U.S. and Western policies in dealing with Russia have often been provocative rather than conciliatory, but they’ve also overlooked the deep historical, cultural and linguistic ties between Russia and Ukraine dating back centuries. The third factor is a Jewish one. Just as the case in Russia, Ukraine has a significant Jewish population, one of the largest in Europe. It’s no secret now, even officially documented, that Jews/Zionists were behind all World Wars. Owner of “Israel,” Rothschilds, funded both sides of all of these wars. Zionists have funded both sides of WW2. They always play both sides to ensure they win. It’s no conspiracy theory at all to say the Ukraine war was also about stealing Rhineland Europe for Ashkenazic Jews. They are ethnically cleansing indigenous White Slovak Ukrainians to make room for their people and to control the country. Why Ukraine? Because Ukraine is located where Khazaria used to be. This is why Zelensky (Zionist Jew) and a clown with a prolific cocaine addiction was chosen to play puppet president. He openly said ‘my dream is to turn Ukraine into “BIG ISRAEL”’ This evil bloody dream resulted in 2 million Ukrainian innocent casualties. Nearly 1 million Ukrainians have been killed so far in the war. The Zionist corrupted regime still actively going on the streets to arrest young people (except Jews) to forcibly send to the front lines to be killed. In this demonic warmongering spree and geopolitical game of imperial 3D chess triggered by the globalists on both banks of the Atlantic, all belonging to the evil WEF criminal club, and of course by Zionists racing time to rush the arrival of their God: The Anti-Christ, through expanding in the Middle-East and globally on the ground and through political dominance, to materialize the map of “Greater Israel”, tens of millions of Ukrainians have been killed and displaced since February, 2022. According to former Ukrainian PM Azarov, “there are now only about 18-19 million people left in Ukraine” Ukraine had 38 million people in 2022! In 2024, there were over 10 million Ukrainians who also lost their homes, and have been forced to flee due to Russia’s bombardments and the escalating acts of violence. The amount of families displaced also affects immigration systems worldwide. In 2023, the World Bank estimates for the reconstruction of Ukraine stood at $411 billion! As why Palestine is unlike Ukraine, although Zionists are a key player in both conflicts and tragedies, even both political ruling classes are dominated by The U.S./Zionists; Zelensky’s regime by CIA/NATO and corrupted Palestinian Authority, which was designed by Tel Aviv and Washington during the ‘Oslo Accord Understandings’ in 1993 to act as a puppet entity and parallel occupation force on behalf of the Zionist occupation and apartheid regime in occupied Jerusalem, West Bank and Gaza Strip?! The answer is simply linked: to the resilient Palestinian people who have been fighting British and ‘Israeli’ occupations for over 100 years now, and never surrendered to all sorts of atrocities even the ongoing genocide. They’re facing ‘Israel’ and all the mighty Western powers behind it, with no regional or international support or protection. That’s why I wasn’t exaggerating when I made a post on X platform recently (I’ve been shadow Banned there since the beginning of Gaza Genocide) stating that ‘Israel’ is practically occupying the whole middle-East all the way to Europe and the United Stated and the only spot that it can’t really occupy/control is no other than Palestine itself. Not only that, I think Palestinians and the ongoing live-streamed genocide against them have made earthquakes in the global public opinion and awareness, especially in the West, where nations there discovered that they’ve been fooled for so long thinking they have free and democratic countries and governments placing human rights on top of their agendas as principals not only mottos. Many people across the world today, including Europe and the U.S. truly believe that they are Palestinians in a sense, as they are facing oppression when it comes to civil liberties, not to mention seeing their governments sending billions of taxpayers’ money to Ukraine and ‘Israel’ constantly so the globalists, Zionists, industrial military complexes and warmongering freaks, money-laundering governmental and black market networks can be satisfied on the expense of countries, their sovereignty and social and economic well-being of their nationals.
France, following the United States in the Ukraine conflict, is often seen as a tool of American policy. What is your opinion on French military intervention and how it is undermining its sovereignty in the face of growing nuclear threats?
France and the United States have a long-standing relationship that dates back to the American Revolution, when France provided crucial support to the American colonies in their fight for independence from Britain. Up to two decades ago, France has consistently pursued a foreign policy that balances its alliance with the U.S. with its own national interests and global ambitions. At times prior to that, characterizing France as a "follower" of the U.S. would oversimplify the dynamics of their relationship. During the ‘Cold War Era’ for example, France was part of the Western bloc and a founding member of NATO, aligning with the U.S. against the Soviet Union. However, under President Charles de Gaulle, France pursued an independent foreign policy, including withdrawing from NATO's military command in 1966 and developing its own nuclear deterrent. This policy was adopted later on the eve of the Iraq War in 2003. France, under President Jacques Chirac, notably opposed the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, demonstrating its willingness to diverge from U.S. policy on the global stage. Things started changing afterwards. In recent years, France and the U.S. have cooperated closely on ‘U.S. ‘Global Counterterrorism’ military and diplomatic campaigns, particularly after the 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris. However, Paris has maintained its own strategic approach to foreign policy in the Middle East and Africa. France, as many other EU countries, is a member of the U.S.-led NATO. While this military alliance provides collective defense, it also means that member countries often align their defense policies with U.S. interests. With Washington unilaterally deciding to go to war on several global fronts in Asia, Africa and the Middle-East under the pretext of fighting terrorism, EU capitals, including Paris, found themselves breathlessly running in this bloody American race which served certain known agendas and against their national interests and security concerns. This has resulted in a limitation on France/EU countries’ sovereignty in political and military matters. What makes the situation even worse now is that a great country like France is open to the idea of having more masters. Not only the American one. Many European leaders belong to the globalists’ club and are political products of the World Economic Forum (WEF). France is no exception here. This becomes too dangerous ,particularly, when another country, Britain, which is known for instigating both world wars, is now led by an insane globalist/WEF product named: PM Stramer, who is declaring now that the UK will be moving into an “operational phase” on the Ukrainian war fronts, including having “boots on the ground and planes in the air”; a scenario backed by the French government, all which may ignite the nuclear clash between Russia and the West. France was truly an American tool in this conflict too. It has adopted the U.S. warmongering expansionist agenda then backed U.S./UK blocking a ceasefire/peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine and now acting in an insanely and irrational manner by showing support to London’s warmongering approach.
You regularly criticize the hypocrisy of Western powers. Doesn’t France lose its moral credibility by aligning itself with the United States in military interventions like Ukraine, especially compared to its relative silence on Israeli crimes against Palestine? How do you assess this double standard in French foreign policy?
France was one of the first countries to recognize ‘Israel’ in 1948, and it even was behind ‘Israel’ obtaining the nuclear weapons through a secret bi-lateral agreement in 1957, which led to the creation of Dimona nuclear complex in the occupation entity. Ironically, ‘Israel’ and France did this against stiff U.S. opposition, led by President John F. Kennedy. Although, France's diplomatic rhetoric often supports a two-state solution and Palestinian self-determination, but its actions, such as arms sales to ‘Israel’, contradict this stance. On one hand it condemns the ‘Israeli’ actions in Palestinian occupied territories, while simultaneously profiting from arms deals which empowers the genocidal occupation and apartheid Zionist entity. That’s first-class hypocrisy. France also frequently supports UN resolutions criticizing ‘Israeli’ illegal settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. However, it does not take concrete steps to pressure Tel Aviv to comply with international law, such as imposing sanctions or trade restrictions. its efforts are often symbolic rather than substantive, lacking the political will to push for meaningful change. In addition to that, France has a large Jewish and Arab/Muslim population, and its policy on the ‘Israeli’ occupation of Palestine is often influenced by domestic considerations. This has led to accusations of inconsistency, as the government tries to appease both communities without taking a firm stand.
You have often linked the fight for justice with the preservation of nature. In the context of the Ukraine-Russia war, Ukraine is ceding its natural resources to the United States while losing its lands in the conflict. Are these exploitations as dangerous as military conflicts?
As a Western-backed puppet President of Ukraine, President Zelensky, is facing all sorts of corruption and governance accusations. Moreover, he’s imprisoning and silencing the voices of opposition and refusing to hold elections making use of the country’s martial law which went into effect since Russia's full-scale military operation in February 2022. This has made many, on domestic and international levels, see him a a ‘dictator’. Meanwhile, an opportunist deal-maker such as President Trump wants to utilize this situation. Trump's approach to U.S. politics is that of a businessman, reflecting his background before and after entering politics. He often uses tactics like brinkmanship and public pressure as he views relationships, both domestic and international, in transactional terms. He also believes that the former U.S. administration has gave the Ukrainian regime billions of American tax-payers’ money and he wants something big in return, as the moment seems to be ideal for him with Ukraine obviously loosing the war and struggling to keep the foreign cash flow in. Ukraine has significant deposits of rare earth minerals and other critical materials. It is estimated to hold approximately 5% of the world’s reserves of rare earths, which are key for technologies like green energy devices, electronics, and defense systems. However, the situation is complicated by the ongoing conflict with Russia. A significant portion of these deposits—particularly in eastern regions like Donetsk, Luhansk, and Zaporizhzhia—is currently under Russian control, limiting Ukraine’s ability to exploit them commercially. Despite the wealth of resources, Ukraine has no operational rare earth mines at present, and developing these deposits would require substantial investment and time, especially given the war’s impact on infrastructure and security. Estimates of the total value of Ukraine’s mineral resources vary widely, ranging from hundreds of billions to over $14 trillion, reflecting both their potential and the challenges in accessing them. Countries under corrupt regimes which are completely dependent on the Western powers, such as Ukraine today, not only lose massively with regards to human fatalities and casualties of war and national soils and territories, but also its natural resources and deposits. This constitutes a war crime against its citizens in the first place, and a crime against those citizens to be born in the years to come.
